Oregon picks up latex glove controversy

SPECIAL REPORT: The Legislature will consider a bill to ban powder-dusted medical gloves that can raise deadly allergies.

By Patrick O’Neill
The Oregonian
Monday, April 21, 1997

Anna Salanti’s worst fear is that she’ll get sick, and somebody will take her to a hospital.

Salanti has a potentially life-threatening allergy to latex, a substance found throughout the medical world.

On Dec. 16, while she was eating dinner in a Las Vegas restaurant, Salanti’s eyes began to itch, and she began to wheeze as her bronchial passages started to squeeze shut.

For the 45-year-old Portland resident, the feeling was all too familiar. Two years earlier, while receiving intravenous antibiotics through a latex tube for an infection, she developed the same symptoms.

Salanti is a vocal supporter of a bill in the Oregon Legislature that would ban latex gloves that are dusted with powder to make them easier to put on and take off. If the bill passes, Oregon would become the first state to ban powdered gloves in health care settings.

Salanti said she developed her allergy 20 years ago while working as a registered nurse in the burn unit of a San Francisco hospital. She would spend her days changing dressings, her hands encased in powdered latex gloves.

At first, her hands became red and sore. Within six months, she no longer could tolerate the gloves. Eventually she became a nursing case manager — a position in which gloves weren’t needed.

But as the years passed, her allergy became so acute that the slightest exposure to latex would set off increasingly severe symptoms. She finally left nursing altogether.

The Las Vegas episode was triggered by a food handler who prepared her meal wearing latex gloves.

Salanti is among a growing number of Americans who are allergic to latex.

The American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology estimates that 18 million Americans, or about 64 in every 1,000, are sensitive to the substance. That’s up from one in 1,000 in the early 1980’s.

The AIDS epidemic has made latex glove manufacturing a growth industry. Not only health care workers wear the gloves but also food service workers, janitors, police and firefighters.

Last year the organization launched a national campaign to raise the level of concern about latex.

Dr. Emil Bardana, head of the Division of Allergy and Immunology at Oregon Health Sciences University, said more and more people are developing latex allergies because of the broad use of powdered latex gloves.

There is widespread concern that the powdered cornstarch used in the gloves binds with the latex protein molecules. Bardana said the protein molecules cause allergic reactions when the body’s immune system mistakes them for harmful invaders. When the gloves are removed, the powder becomes airborne, taking the allergy-causing molecules with it.

The floating, protein-bearing dust can cause sensitivity to latex when people inhale it, he said.

Bardana said that although he’s concerned about latex allergies, he thinks that banning powdered gloves isn’t necessary.

“It seems to me that you may want to educate people to use these products in other ways,” he said.

The bill, proposed by the Oregon Nurses Association, would ban the use of powdered latex gloves in health care settings.

Debate about the bill is laced with both health and economic interests. Oregon has become a battleground for glove manufacturers who are jockeying for competitive advantage.

A Johnson & Johnson official said his company would fight the legislation.

“We are not aware of any scientific evidence that supports this bill,” said Robert V. Andrews, a company spokesman. “Our people are not aware of any evidence that shows there is any greater allergic reaction to powdered gloves.”

Johnson & Johnson casts the issue as a matter of personal choice for nurses and physicians.

“We believe health care workers should be able to choose for themselves which gloves they use,” Andrews said.

Ansell Perry Inc. of Massillon, Ohio, is the world’s largest maker of latex gloves, both powdered and powder-free. Romeo Catracchia, Ansell executive vice president, said his company has encouraged its customers to buy powder-free gloves.

The Oregon legislation, he said, “is aligned to what we would like to see happen in the marketplace.”

Catracchia said powder-free examination gloves are about twice as expensive as the powdered version, and powder-free surgical gloves are four to five times more expensive.

The reduction in medical costs to treat allergic reactions more than makes up for added expense, he said.

John W. Morgan, president of America’s Regent Medical Co. of Norcross, Ga., is in Oregon to help push the bill. His company makes powderless gloves.

“We certainly support the legislation,” he said. “We have an interest in it commercially and ethically.”

Patricia Kabele, a lobbyist for the Oregon Nurses Association, said the issue is one of safety for consumers and health care workers.

“Once you become sensitized, you can go into respiratory arrest just by walking into a hospital,” she said. “It’s egregious. We cannot stand by and let this happen. If you do believe in doing no harm, this is an issue for you.”

Susan McGann, president of the Delaware Valley Latex Allergy Support Network in Philadelphia, said Oregon will take center stage in the latex allergy debates.

“If this legislation passes, Oregon is going to be the ground for multiple issues to come on latex allergy, the biggest of which is who regulates hospital products,” she said.

Salanti’s Las Vegas episode had a happy ending. She called an ambulance and told the emergency workers to take her to a nearby clinic instead of a hospital emergency room, where she thought there would be more latex.

At the clinic, she said, she was given an injection to counter the effects of the latex.


THE ISSUE: The bill would ban latex gloves that are dusted with powder, which makes them easier to put on. Health care experts think molecules of latex adhere to the powder particles, which can be breathed in, giving people allergies to latex.

THE PLAYERS: For: Sen. Thomas Wilde, D-Portland, 1-503-986-1708.

WHAT’S NEXT: A hearing is scheduled before the Senate Health and Human Services Committee at 3 p.m. Tuesday in Hearing Room B at the Capitol in Salem.

Patrick O’Neill covers health care policy issues for The Oregonian’s Health/Medicine/Science team. He can be reached at 503-221-8233 or by fax at 503-294-4150.

Reproduced here with permission.

Table of Contents

Latex Allergy Links — Main Menu

Latex Allergy Links Message Board

Toys & Baby Products — Manufacturers’ Phone Numbers

Latex Gloves in Food Operations PDF
Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services Sep 07 2001

Ever more complex;
Lawsuits and increasing regulation mount as argument over NR latex policies rages

Miles Moore Rubber & Plastics News Jul 30 2001

Living With Latex: Where to be alert for latex
Medical University of South Carolina Children’s Hospital

Handle with care
Ben Van Houten Restaurant Business Aug 01 2000

Allergenic Cross-Reactivity of Latex and Foods
Greer Labs Technical Bulletin #10 Jan 05 2000

Latex Allergy: Another Real Y2K Issue
Lisa M. Jennings, RN CRRN Rehabilitation Nursing Jul/Aug 1999

Potential for Allergy to Natural Rubber Latex Gloves and other Natural Rubber Products
OSHA Technical Information Bulletin Apr 12 1999

Looking Out for Latex
Sandra A. Holmes Science and Children Feb 1999

The Vow of Silence
Marianne McAndrew Journal of Nursing Administration Feb 1999

The legal implications of latex allergy
Peter Kohn RN Jan 1999

Latex Allergy: Everyone’s Concern
Lawrence D. Duffield, DDS Journal of the Michigan Dental Association Jun 1998

Allergen Content of Latex Gloves.
A Market Surveillance Study of Medical Gloves Used in Finland in 1997

Palosuo, Turjanmaa, & Reinikka-Railo

User Facility Reporting Bulletin
selected articles FDA Fall 1997

Latex Allergy Alert
Christine Ozment Exceptional Parent Oct 1997

Latex gloves hand health workers a growing worry
Margaret Veach American Medical News Oct 13 1997

Living with Latex
Lisa Legge Nursing Minnesota Aug 1997

Research Review:
Association between latex sensitization and repeated latex exposure in children

Victoria M. Steelman RN, PhD(c), CNOR AORN Journal Jul 1997

Latex allergy: How safe are your gloves?
Kenneth K. Meyer, MD, FACS and Donald H. Beezhold, PhD
American College of Surgeons Bulletin Jul 1997

User Facility Reporting Bulletin
FDA Spring 1997

Latex allergy among staff poses major headache for hospitals
Meredith Goad Press Herald Portland, ME May 06 1997

Oregon picks up latex glove controversy
Patrick O’Neill The Oregonian Portland, OR Apr 21 1997

Facilities react to growing number of allergies to latex
Linda L. Mullen South Bend Tribune South Bend, IN Apr 13 1997

Growing number of HCW’s developing dangerous reactions to latex
Liz Kowalczyk The Patriot Ledger Quincy, MA Apr 01 1997

Shriners Hospital Stops Using Latex
Pat Cahill Springfield Union Springfield, MA Mar 07 1997

Latex Allergy and Contraception
The Contraception Report Patient Update Mar 1997

Is Latex Paint Hazardous To Latex Allergy Sufferers?
Don Groce Latex Allergy News Oct 1996

Cotton, Nylon, Lycra Spandex and Allergies
Don Groce Latex Allergy News Sep 1996

Paving, Asphalt, Tires & Latex Allergies
Don Groce Latex Allergy News Aug 1996

Special Bulletin: Latex Allergy
American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Q & A: Latex Allergies
American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Preguntas y Respuestas: Alergias al Látex
Asociación Americana de Alergia, Asma e Inmunología

Latex Allergy Survival Kit
Nancy Mitchell 1996

Downloadable/Printable Latex Allergy Signs
For personal, non-commercial use only

Pre-1996 FDA documents
Miscellaneous legislative and other documents

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional, CSS
Copyright © 1996–2007
Last modified: Jan 13 2006